Open AccessSuccessful pod infections by M oniliophthora roreri result in differential T heobroma cacao gene expression depending on the clone's level of tolerance
Author(s) -
Ali Shahin S.,
Melnick Rachel L.,
Crozier Jayne,
PhillipsMora Wilberth,
Strem Mary D.,
Shao Jonathan,
Zhang Dapeng,
Sicher Richard,
Meinhardt Lyndel,
Bailey Bryan A.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
molecular plant pathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.945
H-Index - 103
eISSN - 1364-3703
pISSN - 1464-6722
DOI - 10.1111/mpp.12126
Subject(s) - biology , clone (java method) , point of delivery , gene , gene expression , genetics , differential (mechanical device) , botany , engineering , aerospace engineering
Summary An understanding of the tolerance mechanisms of T heobroma cacao used against M oniliophthora roreri , the causal agent of frosty pod rot, is important for the generation of stable disease‐tolerant clones. A comparative view was obtained of transcript populations of infected pods from two susceptible and two tolerant clones using RNA sequence ( RNA ‐ S eq) analysis. A total of 3009 transcripts showed differential expression among clones. KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes indicated shifts in 152 different metabolic pathways between the tolerant and susceptible clones. Real‐time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (real‐time q RT ‐ PCR ) analyses of 36 genes verified the differential expression. Regression analysis validated a uniform progression in gene expression in association with infection levels and fungal loads in the susceptible clones. Expression patterns observed in the susceptible clones diverged in tolerant clones, with many genes showing higher expression at a low level of infection and fungal load. Principal coordinate analyses of real‐time q RT ‐ PCR data separated the gene expression patterns between susceptible and tolerant clones for pods showing malformation. Although some genes were constitutively differentially expressed between clones, most results suggested that defence responses were induced at low fungal load in the tolerant clones. Several elicitor‐responsive genes were highly expressed in tolerant clones, suggesting rapid recognition of the pathogen and induction of defence genes. Expression patterns suggested that the jasmonic acid–ethylene‐ and/or salicylic acid‐mediated defence pathways were activated in the tolerant clones, being enhanced by reduced brassinosteroid ( BR ) biosynthesis and catabolic inactivation of both BR and abscisic acids. Finally, several genes associated with hypersensitive response‐like cell death were also induced in tolerant clones.