Premium
Cognitive Individual Differences as Predictors of Improvement and Awareness Under Implicit and Explicit Feedback Conditions
Author(s) -
YILMAZ YUCEL,
GRANENA GISELA
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the modern language journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.486
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1540-4781
pISSN - 0026-7902
DOI - 10.1111/modl.12587
Subject(s) - grammaticality , corrective feedback , psychology , cognition , cognitive psychology , implicit learning , debriefing , test (biology) , language production , control (management) , linguistics , mathematics education , social psychology , grammar , computer science , artificial intelligence , paleontology , philosophy , neuroscience , biology
Abstract The present study investigated a group of cognitive individual differences considered advantageous in second language learning and their role in language learning under implicit and explicit feedback conditions using both language awareness and language development measures. The study further investigated whether different types of awareness are related to language development. One hundred and twelve intermediate English learners of Spanish at a U.S. university were administered tests from 2 language aptitude test batteries (Hi‐LAB and LLAMA) and were randomly assigned to an implicit feedback (recast), explicit feedback (explicit correction), or control group. The 2 feedback groups received feedback on the target linguistic form (i.e., Spanish noun–adjective gender agreement) according to their group assignment in 2 treatment sessions. Learners’ knowledge of the linguistic target was measured using a grammaticality judgment test and an oral production task immediately before and after the treatment. Learners’ ability to notice the corrective function and linguistic target of the feedback was measured by means of a posttask debriefing questionnaire. Implicit sequence learning ability and error awareness predicted the implicit group's pretest–posttest improvement, whereas phonological short‐term memory predicted the explicit group's pretest–posttest improvement. Phonemic coding ability, attention control, and processing speed further predicted learners’ awareness in the implicit feedback group.