Premium
CsrA enters Hfq's territory: Regulation of a base‐pairing small RNA
Author(s) -
Stenum Thomas Søndergaard,
Holmqvist Erik
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
molecular microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.857
H-Index - 247
eISSN - 1365-2958
pISSN - 0950-382X
DOI - 10.1111/mmi.14785
Subject(s) - biology , endoribonuclease , rnase p , rna binding protein , transfer rna , rna , transcription (linguistics) , genetics , regulation of gene expression , microbiology and biotechnology , gene , linguistics , philosophy
Post‐transcriptional regulatory networks in Gammaproteobacteria are to a large extent built around the two globally acting RNA‐binding proteins (RBPs) CsrA and Hfq. Both RBPs interact with small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs), but the functional outcomes of these interactions are generally distinct. Whereas Hfq both stabilizes sRNAs and promotes their base‐pairing to target mRNAs, the sRNAs bound by CsrA act as sequestering molecules that titrate the RBP away from its mRNA targets. In this issue of Molecular Microbiology , Lai et al. reveal that CsrA interacts with the Hfq‐associated and base‐pairing sRNA Spot 42. In this case, CsrA increases Spot 42 stability by masking a cleavage site for endoribonuclease RNase E, thereby promoting Spot 42‐dependent regulation of srlA mRNA. Interestingly, the effect of CsrA on srlA expression is two‐fold. In addition to affecting Spot 42‐dependent regulation, CsrA directly inhibits translation of SrlM, an activator of srlA transcription. Together, this study reveals a new function for CsrA and indicates more intricate connections between the CsrA and Hfq networks than previously anticipated. Several recent studies have identified additional RBPs that interact with sRNAs. With new RBP identification methods at hand, it will be intriguing to see how many more sRNA‐binding proteins will be uncovered.