Premium
Functional interaction between ELL transcription elongation factor and Epe1 reveals the role of Epe1 in the regulation of transcription outside heterochromatin
Author(s) -
Sweta Kumari,
Sharma Nimisha
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
molecular microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.857
H-Index - 247
eISSN - 1365-2958
pISSN - 0950-382X
DOI - 10.1111/mmi.14691
Subject(s) - biology , schizosaccharomyces pombe , rna polymerase ii , heterochromatin , transcription (linguistics) , transcription factor , genetics , gene silencing , schizosaccharomyces , mutant , elongation factor , microbiology and biotechnology , dna , rna , gene , chromatin , promoter , gene expression , ribosome , linguistics , philosophy
Eleven‐nineteen lysine‐rich leukemia (ELL) is a eukaryotic RNA polymerase II transcription elongation factor. In Schizosaccharomyces pombe , it is important for survival under genotoxic stress conditions. However, the molecular basis underlying this function of ELL in S. pombe is yet to be deciphered. Here, we carried out a genetic screen to identify multicopy suppressor(s) that could restore normal growth of ell1 deletion mutant in the presence of DNA damaging agent. Sequence analysis of the identified suppressors revealed the anti‐silencing protein, Epe1, as one of the suppressors of ell1 deletion associated genotoxic stress sensitivity. Our results further demonstrate that the overexpression of Epe1 could suppress all other phenotypes associated with the absence of Ell1. Moreover, transcriptional defect of ell1Δ strain could also be alleviated by the overexpression of Epe1. Epe1 also showed a physical interaction with Ell1. Interestingly, we also observed that the region of Epe1 encompassing 403–948 amino acids was indispensable for all the above functions. Furthermore, our results show that the overexpression of Epe1 causes increased H3K9 acetylation and RNA polymerase II recruitment. Taken together, our results show a functional interaction between Epe1 and Ell1, and this function is independent of the well‐known JmjC and N‐terminal transcriptional activation domains of Epe1 in S. pombe .