Premium
The evolutionary impact of intragenic FliA promoters in proteobacteria
Author(s) -
Fitzgerald Devon M.,
Smith Carol,
Lapierre Pascal,
Wade Joseph T.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
molecular microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.857
H-Index - 247
eISSN - 1365-2958
pISSN - 0950-382X
DOI - 10.1111/mmi.13941
Subject(s) - promoter , biology , genetics , sigma factor , gene , conserved sequence , transcription (linguistics) , genome , gene expression , base sequence , linguistics , philosophy
Summary In Escherichia coli , one sigma factor recognizes the majority of promoters, and six ‘alternative’ sigma factors recognize specific subsets of promoters. The alternative sigma factor FliA (σ 28 ) recognizes promoters upstream of many flagellar genes. We previously showed that most E. coli FliA binding sites are located inside genes. However, it was unclear whether these intragenic binding sites represent active promoters. Here, we construct and assay transcriptional promoter‐ lacZ fusions for all 52 putative FliA promoters previously identified by ChIP‐seq. These experiments, coupled with integrative analysis of published genome‐scale transcriptional datasets, strongly suggest that most intragenic FliA binding sites are active promoters that transcribe highly unstable RNAs. Additionally, we show that widespread intragenic FliA‐dependent transcription may be a conserved phenomenon, but that specific promoters are not themselves conserved. We conclude that intragenic FliA‐dependent promoters and the resulting RNAs are unlikely to have important regulatory functions. Nonetheless, one intragenic FliA promoter is broadly conserved and constrains evolution of the overlapping protein‐coding gene. Thus, our data indicate that intragenic regulatory elements can influence bacterial protein evolution and suggest that the impact of intragenic regulatory sequences on genome evolution should be considered more broadly.