Premium
Logical Form and the Vernacular Revisited
Author(s) -
Botterell Andrew,
Stainton Robert J.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
mind and language
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.905
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1468-0017
pISSN - 0268-1064
DOI - 10.1111/mila.12151
Subject(s) - linguistics , logical form , epistemology , vernacular , philosophy , logical consequence , domain (mathematical analysis) , logical conjunction , mathematics , computer science , cognitive science , psychology , mathematical analysis
We revisit a debate initiated some 15 years ago by Ray Elugardo and Robert Stainton about the domain of arguments. Our main result is that arguments are not exclusively sets of linguistic expressions. Instead, as we put it, some non‐linguistic items have ‘logical form’. The crucial examples are arguments, both deductive and inductive, made with unembedded words and phrases. … sub sentential expressions such as singular terms and predicates… cannot serve as premises or conclusions in inferences (R. Brandom, 2000, p. 40).