z-logo
Premium
Animal Mindreading: A Defense of Optimistic Agnosticism
Author(s) -
Lurz Robert W.,
Kanet Sharisse,
Krachun Carla
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
mind and language
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.905
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1468-0017
pISSN - 0268-1064
DOI - 10.1111/mila.12058
Subject(s) - agnosticism , psychology , theory of mind , epistemology , cognitive psychology , cognition , cognitive science , social psychology , philosophy , neuroscience
We recommend the attitude of optimistic agnosticism toward animal mindreading: suspending acceptance until tests succeed in overcoming Povinelli's problem, and being optimistic about the feasibility of such tests. Fletcher and Carruthers argue for sufficient reasons to accept animal mindreading; we find their arguments unconvincing. Points they raise against the behavior‐reading theory apply equally to mindreading theory, and their claims of greater parsimony are unfounded. Premature acceptance of mindreading could inhibit the search for innovative ways to overcome longstanding methodological problems. Optimistic agnosticism, in contrast, encourages the pursuit of approaches that can lead to important insights about animal social cognition.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here