z-logo
Premium
Viciousness and Circles of Ground
Author(s) -
Bliss Ricki
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
metaphilosophy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.475
H-Index - 35
eISSN - 1467-9973
pISSN - 0026-1068
DOI - 10.1111/meta.12072
Subject(s) - coherentism , foundationalism , common ground , ground , metaphysics , transitive relation , epistemology , philosophy , mathematics , sociology , physics , communication , quantum mechanics , combinatorics
Metaphysicians of a certain stripe are almost unanimously of the view that grounding is necessarily irreflexive, asymmetric, transitive, and well‐founded. They deny the possibility of circles of ground and, therewith, the possibility of species of metaphysical coherentism. But what's so bad about circles of ground? One problem for coherentism might be that it ushers in anti‐foundationalism: grounding loops give rise to infinite regresses. And this is bad because infinite grounding regresses are vicious. This article argues that circles of ground do not necessarily give rise to infinite regresses, and where they do, those regresses are not necessarily vicious.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here