Premium
Medical student well‐being during rural clinical placement: A cross‐sectional national survey
Author(s) -
Saikal Aiasha,
Pit Sabrina Wia,
McCarthy Louella
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
medical education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.776
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1365-2923
pISSN - 0308-0110
DOI - 10.1111/medu.14078
Subject(s) - workforce , cross sectional study , odds ratio , context (archaeology) , medicine , rural area , logistic regression , family medicine , feeling , psychology , nursing , medical education , geography , social psychology , political science , archaeology , pathology , law
Context Understanding rural student well‐being is essential to inform the development and training of the future rural medical workforce so as to ensure a pipeline of rural doctors to meet rural communities' needs. However, little is known about the well‐being of students who are on rural placement. This study aims to identify the predictors of well‐being amongst a national sample of medical students on rural clinical placement. Methods The Federation of Rural Australian Medical Educators (FRAME) 2015 national exit survey of medical students, completed at the end of rural terms, was used ( n = 644) to test the associations between well‐being and demographic, financial, academic, supervisor, placement and clinical skills factors, and attitude to future rural work. Univariate and logistic regression were used. Results Students aged 18‐24 years (odds ratio [OR], 8.07 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.07‐31.46]) and 25‐34 years (OR, 4.06 [95% CI, 1.35‐12.18]) reported higher levels of well‐being compared to students aged over 35 years. Academic support from the rural clinical school (OR, 5.74 [95% CI, 2.59‐12.73]), perceived respect from supervisors (OR, 3.13 [95% CI, 1.23‐7.99]), not feeling socially isolated (OR, 2.7 [95% CI, 1.40‐5.20]), access to counselling services (OR, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.10‐3.83]), rural placement being a first choice (OR, 3.04 [95% CI, 1.58‐5.86]) and positive attitudes to being part of a rural workforce in the future (OR, 4.0 [95% CI, 2.0‐8.3]) were associated with higher odds of well‐being compared to students who felt the opposite. Gender, rural background, financial support, clinical skills and role clarity were not found to be associated with well‐being ( P > .5). Conclusions This study may provide guidance to rural clinical schools, policymakers and medical educators in developing rural placement programmes that enhance student well‐being so we can address workforce shortages in rural areas.