Premium
How I learned to stop worrying and love the bias
Author(s) -
Reiter Harold I,
McConnell Meghan
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
medical education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.776
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1365-2923
pISSN - 0308-0110
DOI - 10.1111/medu.12602
Subject(s) - library science , citation , psychology , operations research , computer science , engineering
Within a therapeutic beam of radiation, you can expect a homogeneous dose of absorbed energy until you approach the beam edge. By convention, at the beam edge, 50% of the absorbed dose is delivered. A few millimetres from the edge towards the central axis of the beam, it’s close to 100%. A few millimetres away, it’s close to 0%. The beam penumbra is that region of rapidly changing absorbed dose that extends from the central axis of the beam. In most situations, you’d want a sharp demarcation between what you want to treat and what you don’t, so a small penumbra is good. But what if you have to treat with two beams, side by side? You don’t want a gap, which would leave the junction between the two beams under-dosed. You don’t want overlap, which would give the tissues at the junction twice the prescribed dose. Aligned perfectly, with 50% at the beam edge for each, there would be neither gap nor overlap. But the slightest error, or patient movement, courts catastrophe.