z-logo
Premium
How I learned to stop worrying and love the bias
Author(s) -
Reiter Harold I,
McConnell Meghan
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
medical education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.776
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1365-2923
pISSN - 0308-0110
DOI - 10.1111/medu.12602
Subject(s) - library science , citation , psychology , operations research , computer science , engineering
Within a therapeutic beam of radiation, you can expect a homogeneous dose of absorbed energy until you approach the beam edge. By convention, at the beam edge, 50% of the absorbed dose is delivered. A few millimetres from the edge towards the central axis of the beam, it’s close to 100%. A few millimetres away, it’s close to 0%. The beam penumbra is that region of rapidly changing absorbed dose that extends from the central axis of the beam. In most situations, you’d want a sharp demarcation between what you want to treat and what you don’t, so a small penumbra is good. But what if you have to treat with two beams, side by side? You don’t want a gap, which would leave the junction between the two beams under-dosed. You don’t want overlap, which would give the tissues at the junction twice the prescribed dose. Aligned perfectly, with 50% at the beam edge for each, there would be neither gap nor overlap. But the slightest error, or patient movement, courts catastrophe.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here