What does ‘race’ have to do with medical education research?

Context We live in a world of ethnoracial conflict. This is confirmed every day by opening and reading the newspaper. This everyday world seems far away in the pages of a medical education journal, but is it? The goal of this paper is to suggest that one need not look very far in medical education to encounter ethnoracial issues, and further, that research methods that are not ethnoracially biased must be employed to study these topics. Discussion We will draw attention to the relevance of employing an ethical conceptual approach to research involving ‘race’ by demonstrating how one author researching internationally educated health professionals has put ‘race’ front and centre in his analysis. He does this by using a postcolonial method of analysis termed a ‘doubled‐research’ technique that sets up categories such as ‘race’ but then decolonizes them to avoid essentialism or stereotyping. We compare this method to another mainstream method employed for the same topic of inquiry which has sidelined ‘race’ in the analysis, potentially hiding findings about ethnoracial relations involving health professionals in our ‘multicultural’ society. This demonstration leads to the important question of whether research methods can be epistemologically racist–a question that has been raised about conventional research on education in general. Our argument is not meant to be the last word on this topic, but the first in this journal. Conclusions We conclude that there is an internal ethics or axiology within research perspectives and methodologies that needs to be examined where ethnoracial issues are prominent. The use of mainstream approaches to undertake research can unintentionally ‘leave unsaid’ central aspects of what is researched while antiracist methods such as the one described in this article can open up the data to allow for a richer and deeper understanding of the problem.