Open AccessAssessing public financing for nutrition in Bhutan, Nepal and Sri Lanka
Author(s) -
Andersen Christopher T.,
Cain Jewelwayne S.,
Chaudhery Deepika N.,
Ghimire Mamata,
Higashi Hideki,
Tandon Ajay
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
maternal and child nutrition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1740-8709
pISSN - 1740-8695
DOI - 10.1111/mcn.13320
Subject(s) - per capita , psychological intervention , gross domestic product , medicine , government (linguistics) , environmental health , clinical nutrition , economic growth , socioeconomics , economics , population , nursing , linguistics , philosophy
The objective of this study was to assess public financing for nutrition in Bhutan, Nepal and Sri Lanka to identify limitations of available data and to discuss policy implications. A variant of the Scaling Up Nutrition Movement methodology was used. Budget allocations and expenditures for relevant government ministries during 2012–2018 were identified. Nutrition‐related line items were tagged using definitions of nutrition‐specific and nutrition‐sensitive interventions. Data were aggregated by year and calculated in constant United States dollars (USD). Expenditures by year were presented as a proportion of gross domestic product and general government expenditures. The percent utilization of budget allocations and proportion of funding from central government sources were determined. Per capita expenditures on nutrition‐specific interventions varied from USD 1.08–8.76 and for nutrition‐sensitive interventions varied from USD 20.22–51.20. Nutrition‐specific expenditures as a percent of gross domestic product ranged from 0.08% in Sri Lanka in 2017% to 0.34% in Nepal in 2016. The median utilization rate was 64% for nutrition‐specific and 84% for nutrition‐sensitive interventions. Nutrition‐specific funding financed by the central government was 90.7% in Bhutan and 99.4% in Sri Lanka. This study revealed the need to prioritize and invest in evidence‐based interventions, including balancing investments in nutrition‐specific versus ‐sensitive interventions. Challenges in estimation of nutrition expenditures and cross‐country comparison were also observed, highlighting the need for appropriate nutrition line item tagging and standardized systems for data collection.