Premium
How Do We Choose Among Strategies to Accomplish Cognitive Tasks? Evidence From Behavioral and Event‐Related Potential Data in Arithmetic Problem Solving
Author(s) -
Taillan Julien,
Dufau Stéphane,
Lemaire Patrick
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
mind, brain, and education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.624
H-Index - 35
eISSN - 1751-228X
pISSN - 1751-2271
DOI - 10.1111/mbe.12095
Subject(s) - cognition , arithmetic , event related potential , computer science , event (particle physics) , event data , cognitive psychology , task (project management) , psychology , artificial intelligence , mathematics , neuroscience , physics , management , quantum mechanics , economics , information extraction
We used event‐related potentials ( ERPs ) to determine the time course of mechanisms underlying strategy selection. Participants had to select the better strategy on multiplication problems (i.e., 51 × 27) to find approximate products. They could choose between rounding up and rounding down both operands to their nearest decades. Two types of problems were tested, homogeneous problems (e.g., 34 × 61) and heterogeneous problems (e.g., 61 × 36). Homogeneous problems are easier to solve because both operands are close to the lowest or the upper decades. Behavioral data revealed that participants selected the better strategy more often on homogeneous problems. ERPs showed that homogeneous problems elicited more positive cerebral activities than heterogeneous problems in the 0–200 and 800–1,000 ms windows, and more negative cerebral activities than heterogeneous problems in the 400–600 ms window. These findings have important theoretical implications for our understanding of the mechanisms underlying strategy selection.