Premium
Subject‐Specific League Tables and Students' Application Decisions
Author(s) -
Chevalier Arnaud,
Jia Xiaoxuan
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
the manchester school
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.361
H-Index - 42
eISSN - 1467-9957
pISSN - 1463-6786
DOI - 10.1111/manc.12124
Subject(s) - league table , ranking (information retrieval) , league , judgement , subject (documents) , quality (philosophy) , institution , standard deviation , psychology , affect (linguistics) , actuarial science , medical education , statistics , computer science , political science , business , mathematics , medicine , economics , information retrieval , library science , law , philosophy , physics , communication , epistemology , astronomy , classical economics
Do applicants to higher education rely on expert judgement about the quality of the course when applying? Using application data across UK universities over a period of 8 years, we investigate how league tables affect prospective students' application decisions. We use subject‐specific ranking rather than the commonly used institution‐level ranking. We find that a one standard deviation change in the subject‐level ranking score of an institution is associated with, on average, a 4.3 per cent increase in application numbers per faculty. This effect is particularly pronounced among faculties with the best scores, and overseas applicants. Limits to the number of choices per applicant have increased the preponderance of league tables.