z-logo
Premium
Insular Decision Making in the Board Room: Why Boards Retain and Hire Substandard CEOs
Author(s) -
AdachiSato Meg
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
the manchester school
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.361
H-Index - 42
eISSN - 1467-9957
pISSN - 1463-6786
DOI - 10.1111/manc.12055
Subject(s) - negotiation , business , accounting , relation (database) , corporate governance , on board , microeconomics , economics , industrial organization , finance , law , computer science , political science , engineering , database , aerospace engineering
This paper explores why a corporate board often fails to replace a substandard CEO . I consider the situation in which the incumbent CEO and directors make decisions in the absence of the new CEO . I show that the board and the CEO maximize the expected utilities of the negotiating parties that do not include the expected utility of the potential CEO . This sometimes results in the retention of an inefficient CEO . I argue this same logic provides a theoretical explanation for how a new CEO is chosen in relation to both the voluntary and enforced replacement of an existing CEO .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom