Premium
Pests controlling pests: does predator control lead to greater E uropean rabbit abundance in A ustralasia?
Author(s) -
Norbury Grant,
Jones Chris
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
mammal review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.574
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1365-2907
pISSN - 0305-1838
DOI - 10.1111/mam.12034
Subject(s) - predation , biology , predator , abundance (ecology) , burrow , ecology , population , european rabbit , habitat , demography , sociology
In N ew Z ealand and A ustralia, rural landowners believe that local predator control to protect indigenous biota exacerbates E uropean rabbit O ryctolagus cuniculus problems on their land. We assess the validity of their concerns by reviewing the published literature on effects of predators on rabbit abundance. In N ew Z ealand, where rabbits and their predators are introduced, predators appear to have relatively little effect on rabbit numbers compared with other factors leading to mortality, such as disease, flooding of burrows and burrow collapse. Similarly, in A ustralia, rabbit numbers are driven primarily by climate and its effects on food abundance and quality, and by disease. However, where rabbit numbers are low following drought or major epizootics, predation can limit population recovery. In the I berian P eninsula, where rabbits and their predators are indigenous, the effects of predators are unknown, as they are often confounded by other factors. Rabbit numbers are influenced mostly by habitat, food, disease and rainfall. Elsewhere in E urope, predators have their strongest effect when rabbit numbers have been reduced by other factors, but have little effect on high‐density rabbit populations. In A ustralasia, abundance of predators (especially rabbit specialists) can usually be predicted from rabbit abundance, not vice versa. Although predation effects can be limiting under certain conditions, they are minor compared to the roles of climate, food, disease and habitat. A key unresolved question is whether those circumstances where predator control might lead to increases in rabbit populations can be identified with enough certainty to allow reliable predictions to be generated. One approach is to implement robust rabbit, predator and disease monitoring programmes at sites with predator control operations. Data on changes in rabbits, predators, and disease prevalence could be combined with local data on other key factors to facilitate reasonable inference about effects of predators on rabbits. The inclusion of carefully matched non‐treatment areas is crucial if such programmes are to succeed.