z-logo
Premium
Clinical diagnostic criteria for detrusor underactivity: A report from the Japanese Continence Society working group on underactive bladder
Author(s) -
Yoshida Masaki,
Sekido Naritoshi,
Matsukawa Yoshihisa,
Yono Makoto,
Yamaguchi Osamu
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
luts: lower urinary tract symptoms
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.451
H-Index - 15
eISSN - 1757-5672
pISSN - 1757-5664
DOI - 10.1111/luts.12356
Subject(s) - medicine , overactive bladder , bladder outlet obstruction , lower urinary tract symptoms , urology , gynecology , pathology , prostate , alternative medicine , cancer
Detrusor underactivity (DU) is a common bladder dysfunction that causes lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in both men and women. Currently DU can only be diagnosed by an invasive urodynamic test. Underactive bladder (UAB) is the symptom‐based correlate of DU, as is the case with overactive bladder (OAB) and detrusor overactivity (DO). The International Continence Society (ICS) consensus group has recently proposed a working definition of UAB as a symptom syndrome suggestive of DU. However, a symptom complex of UAB is shared by LUTS attributable to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Thus, UAB is not specific for DU, leading to difficulties in determining a therapeutic target (DU or BOO) in the initial management of UAB. Under these circumstances, a consensus group was formed under the auspices of the Japanese Continence Society (JCS) and diagnostic criteria were produced to potentially identify patients likely to have DU, without a pressure/flow study‐based diagnosis. Certain symptoms and several noninvasive test parameters have been reported as clinical predictors of DU, and were suggested to discriminate DU from BOO. Of these predictive factors, the more commonly used parameters were used to develop clinical diagnostic criteria for DU. This article presents the clinical diagnostic criteria for DU proposed by the JCS consensus group and aims to summarize the background discussion by the group.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here