z-logo
Premium
Effect of Preoperative Low Maximal Flow Rate on Postoperative Voiding Trials after the Midurethral Sling Procedure in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence
Author(s) -
CHAE Ji Y.,
BAE Jae H.,
LEE Jeong G.,
PARK Hong S.,
MOON Du G.,
OH Mi M.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
luts: lower urinary tract symptoms
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.451
H-Index - 15
eISSN - 1757-5672
pISSN - 1757-5664
DOI - 10.1111/luts.12170
Subject(s) - medicine , sling (weapon) , urinary incontinence , surgery , urology , stress incontinence , randomized controlled trial , anesthesia
Objectives To evaluate the effects of preoperative low maximal flow rate ( Q max) on voiding trials after the midurethral sling ( MUS ) procedure in women with stress urinary incontinence ( SUI ). Methods One hundred and sixty‐eight women who underwent MUS procedure were enrolled. Preoperative free uroflowmetry was performed and patients were divided by Q max. Low Q max was defined as a Q max under 15 mL/sec with voided volume at least 150 mL. Surgical results, failure of voiding trial, and postoperative uroflowmetry parameters were compared between the groups. Failure of voiding trial was defined by a PVR more than 100 mL on postoperative uroflowmetry. Results At the discharge day, there were 42 cases showing failure of voiding trial and 33 cases requiring CIC , but only one patient showed failure of voiding trial at 12 months postoperatively. Overall, 48 patients had preoperative low Q max. Low Q max group showed lower Q max in all of postoperative uroflowmetry, but there were no significant differences in the rate of postoperative voiding trial failure or CIC . The low Q max group was then divided into two groups according to the preoperative detrusor pressure at Q max over and under 20  cmH 2 O in pressure flow study. Comparing the two groups, no significant differences were observed in the cure rate, voiding trial failure or CIC . Conclusions Our results suggest that women with preoperative low Q max experienced no definite unfavorable voiding problem from the MUS procedure compared to those with normal voiding function. MUS procedure may be regarded as a safe and successful procedure in SUI women with low Q max.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom