z-logo
Premium
Dyadic Representation in a Westminster System
Author(s) -
Hanretty Chris,
Lauderdale Benjamin E.,
Vivyan Nick
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
legislative studies quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.728
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1939-9162
pISSN - 0362-9805
DOI - 10.1111/lsq.12148
Subject(s) - legislature , representation (politics) , public opinion , political science , public administration , function (biology) , electoral system , proportional representation , political economy , politics , law , sociology , democracy , evolutionary biology , biology
Is policy representation in contemporary Westminster systems solely a function of programmatic national parties, or does the election of legislators via single‐member districts result in MPs whose policy positions are individually responsive to public opinion in their constituencies? We generate new measures of constituency opinion in Britain and show that, in three different policy domains and controlling for MP party, the observed legislative behavior of MPs is indeed responsive to constituency opinion. The level of responsiveness is moderate, but our results do suggest a constituency‐MP policy bond that operates in addition to the well‐known bond between voters and parties.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here