Premium
[ 18 F]‐Fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐ D ‐galactose positron emission tomography/computed tomography as complementary imaging tool in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
Author(s) -
BakFredslund Kirstine P.,
Keiding Susanne,
Villadsen Gerda E.,
Kramer Stine,
Schlander Sven,
Sørensen Michael
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
liver international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.873
H-Index - 110
eISSN - 1478-3231
pISSN - 1478-3223
DOI - 10.1111/liv.14293
Subject(s) - hepatocellular carcinoma , medicine , positron emission tomography , nuclear medicine , magnetic resonance imaging , radiology
Background & Aims Positron emission tomography (PET) with the liver‐specific tracer [ 18 F]‐fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐ D ‐galactose ( 18 F‐FDGal) can be used for imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Curative intended and locoregional treatments of HCC require absence of extrahepatic disease. The aim of this prospective study was to determine whether adding 18 F‐FDGal PET/CT to standard work‐up changes the planned treatment in patients with HCC deemed suitable for curative or locoregional treatment. Methods Fifty patients with HCC were included at our tertiary liver centre. The primary study outcome was a change in treatment strategy. A subgroup of 29 patients was also examined with [ 18 F]‐fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐ D ‐glucose ( 18 F‐FDG) PET/CT for comparison. Results 18 F‐FDGal PET/CT detected eight extrahepatic HCC metastases in six patients (12%), which were primarily not detected by ceCT or MRI. These findings led to a change in treatment in five patients (10%). One of the eight extrahepatic HCC foci was also detected by 18 F‐FDG PET/CT. A total of 85 malignant intrahepatic foci were examined, 12 of these were new findings by 18 F‐FDGal PET/CT which had a sensitivity of 71%, highest for large foci. None of the additional intrahepatic foci found by 18 F‐FDGal PET changed the planned treatment. Conclusions For the detection of extrahepatic HCC metastases, 18 F‐FDGal PET/CT was superior both to standard clinical work‐up with contrast‐enhanced CT, and/or MRI, and to 18 F‐FDG PET/CT in patients deemed suitable for locoregional treatment. 18 F‐FDGal PET/CT led to a change in the planned treatment in 10% of the patients whereas 18 F‐FDG PET/CT did not change the planned treatment in any patient.