Premium
Diagnostic hepatic haemodynamic techniques: safety and radiation exposure
Author(s) -
Hari Andrej,
Nair Hari Kumar,
De Gottardi Andrea,
Baumgartner Iris,
Dufour JeanFrançois,
Berzigotti Annalisa
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
liver international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.873
H-Index - 110
eISSN - 1478-3231
pISSN - 1478-3223
DOI - 10.1111/liv.13215
Subject(s) - medicine , portal venous pressure , fluoroscopy , effective dose (radiation) , transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt , nuclear medicine , radiology , portal hypertension , cirrhosis
Background & Aims Hepatic venous pressure gradient ( HVPG ) and transjugular liver biopsy ( TJLB ) are increasingly used in the management of patients with liver disease. We aimed to describe the safety profile of these procedures, providing data on the intra‐ and periprocedure complications, radiation exposure and amount of iodinated contrast material used. Methods In 106 consecutive patients undergoing HVPG and TJLB data on fluoroscopy time ( FT ), absorbed radiation dose, equivalent effective dose ( mS v) and volume of iodinated contrast material ( ICM ) were prospectively collected and reviewed, together with clinical and laboratory data. Incidence and severity of procedure‐related complications were assessed. In 28 hospitalised patients, creatinine values after 72 hours of the procedure were reviewed to identify contrast‐induced nephropathy ( CIN ). Results Median effective radiation dose was 5.4 mSv ( IQR 10 mSv). A total 28.3% of patients exceeded an effective exposure of 10 mSv and 9.4% exceeded 20 mSv. Only age and BMI correlated with radiation dose ( R = .327, P =.001 and R = .410, P <.0001 respectively), and only BMI remained independently associated with an exposure over 20 mSv. Procedure‐related complications occurred in eight patients (7.5%), and were minor in six cases. Median ICM volume was 12.5 mL. 6/28 patients met the diagnostic criteria for CIN. Conclusions Hepatic venous pressure gradient and Transjugular liver biopsy show a good safety profile and radiation exposure associated with these procedures is in most of the cases low. In hepatic haemodynamic procedures, efforts should be made to reduce the radiation dose in patients with overweight/obesity and to use the minimal possible ICM volume in patients with acute‐on‐chronic liver failure.