z-logo
Premium
Optimizing treatment for HCV genotype 4: PEG‐IFN alfa 2a vs. PEG‐IFN alfa 2b; the debate continues
Author(s) -
Esmat Gamal,
El Kassas Mohamed,
Hassany Mohamed,
Gamil Mohamed,
El Raziky Maissa
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
liver international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.873
H-Index - 110
eISSN - 1478-3231
pISSN - 1478-3223
DOI - 10.1111/liv.12397
Subject(s) - ribavirin , genotype , medicine , hepatitis c virus , peg ratio , virology , hepatitis c , pegylated interferon , immunology , virus , biology , gene , genetics , finance , economics
Hepatitis C virus ( HCV ) remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Combined therapy with pegylated interferon ( PEG ‐ IFN ) and ribavirin is the current standard of care treatment for HCV genotype 4. Two types of PEG ‐ IFN are commercially available. The limited number of trials that were conducted for HCV genotype 4 and the few head to head comparisons make it impossible to know which is the best option? In this article we review all available PEG ‐ IFN trials performed worldwide for HCV genotype 4 since 2004. Unless another molecule is developed as a standalone for the treatment of HCV , PEG ‐ IFN will continue to be a source of debate.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom