Premium
Encouraging interviewees to say more and deception: The ghostwriter method
Author(s) -
Leal Sharon,
Vrij Aldert,
Deeb Haneen,
Kamermans Kevin
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
legal and criminological psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.65
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 2044-8333
pISSN - 1355-3259
DOI - 10.1111/lcrp.12152
Subject(s) - deception , psychology , social psychology , control (management) , verifiable secret sharing , computer science , artificial intelligence , set (abstract data type) , programming language
Background We examined a new method to encourage interviewees to say more, the ghostwriter method, and examined its effect on eliciting information and cues to deceit. Method A total of 150 truth tellers and liars either told the truth about a trip they made in the last 12 months or pretended to have made such a trip. They were allocated to a Control condition, a ‘Be detailed’ condition in which they were encouraged to report even small details and a ghostwriter condition in which they were told to imagine talking to a ghostwriter. The dependent variables were details, complications, common knowledge details, self‐handicapping strategies, proportion of complications, plausibility, and verifiable sources. Results The ghostwriter condition elicited more details and revealed in plausibility a stronger cue to deceit than the other two conditions. Conclusion The ghostwriter method appears to be a promising tool for eliciting information and cues to deceit.