z-logo
Premium
Flexibility and Authority: Resolving Labor Disputes in A County Government in Western China
Author(s) -
He Xin,
Su Yang
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
law and society review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.867
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1540-5893
pISSN - 0023-9216
DOI - 10.1111/lasr.12443
Subject(s) - flexibility (engineering) , agency (philosophy) , economic justice , dispute resolution , business , government (linguistics) , china , law and economics , public relations , public administration , sociology , law , political science , economics , management , linguistics , philosophy , social science
Existing literature regards flexibility and authority as key characteristics of informal justice. We further contend that the combination of the two is crucial for informal justice to be effective. We investigate the process of dispute resolution by a Chinese labor agency. Following the life cycles of a sample of 810 labor disputes, we find that this informal justice forum was efficient and effective, made possible by the combination of flexibility and authority. Flexibility means that the agency attracts certain types of cases that are usually screened out of the formal legal system and that agency officials use “informal,” hence flexible, techniques. Authority means that the administrative agency possesses additional powers over the disputants; hence, the disputants are under pressure to follow its suggestions and decisions. A comparative analysis of various cases of informal justice reinforces the importance of combining flexibility and authority. We further demonstrate that flexibility without authority is insufficient and that some informal justice forums are effective because they enjoy both.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here