z-logo
Premium
Mass‐based condition measures and their relationship with fitness: in what condition is condition?
Author(s) -
Barnett C. A.,
Suzuki T. N.,
Sakaluk S. K.,
Thompson C. F.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of zoology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.915
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1469-7998
pISSN - 0952-8369
DOI - 10.1111/jzo.12213
Subject(s) - biology , evolutionary biology
Mass‐ or body‐size measures of ‘condition’ are of central importance to the study of ecology and evolution, and it is often assumed that differences in condition measures are positively and linearly related to fitness. Using examples drawn from ecological studies, we show that indices of condition frequently are unlikely to be related to fitness in a linear fashion. Researchers need to be more explicit in acknowledging the limitations of mass‐based condition measures and accept that, under some circumstances, they may not relate to fitness as traditionally assumed. Any relationship between a particular condition measure and fitness should first be empirically validated before condition is used as a proxy for fitness. In the absence of such evidence, researchers should explicitly acknowledge that assuming such a relationship may be unrealistic.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here