Premium
Determinants of spatial patterns of canopy tree species in a tropical evergreen forest in Gabon
Author(s) -
Engone Obiang Nestor Laurier,
Kenfack David,
Picard Nicolas,
Lutz James A.,
Bissiengou Pulchérie,
Memiaghe Hervé R.,
Alonso Alfonso
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of vegetation science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.1
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1654-1103
pISSN - 1100-9233
DOI - 10.1111/jvs.12778
Subject(s) - canopy , ecology , biological dispersal , evergreen , spatial ecology , species distribution , biology , spatial distribution , tree canopy , population , habitat , geography , demography , remote sensing , sociology
Abstract Questions We examined the spatial patterns of dominant canopy species in a tropical forest to investigate: (a) what is the niche occupancy of canopy species with respect to topographic gradients; (b) what are the dominant ecological processes that explain their distribution; (c) what are the interactions among the most prevalent canopy species; and (d) what are the interactions between canopy species adults and juveniles trees? Location Rabi permanent CTFS‐ForestGEO plot, Gabon. Methods We selected the four most abundant canopy species and one timber species. We used Berman's test to determine the effect of three topographic variables on the distribution of each species and univariate analysis to model the spatial pattern of each species using either an inhomogeneous Poisson process or an inhomogeneous Cox process. We also used a bivariate form of the pair correlation function (PCF) to determine the spatial interaction between species and the correlation among conspecific adult and juvenile trees. Results Four of the five species had aggregated spatial patterns while Lophira alata showed spatial randomness. Most of the variance in the local tree density was explained by within‐population dispersal processes rather than environmental factors. Bivariate PCF tests showed significant segregation between species associations. Two species exhibited aggregation at small distances between young and adult trees, while others showed either complete spatial randomness at small inter‐tree distances or segregation at large distances. Conclusions This study showed that the spatial pattern in the majority of canopy species was aggregation. Seed dispersal limitation mainly explained the observed aggregation pattern. Habitat filtering, as evidenced by the influence of topographic variables on niche occupancy, marginally, yet significantly, explained this pattern. The different spatial patterns of the principal species permit their coexistence. Spatial segregation among adult and juvenile trees reveals a strong pattern of either species‐specific seed predation or pathogens.