Premium
Soil seed banks in the floodplain of a large river: A test of hypotheses on seed bank composition in relation to flooding and established vegetation
Author(s) -
Greulich Sabine,
Chevalier Richard,
Villar Marc
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of vegetation science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.1
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1654-1103
pISSN - 1100-9233
DOI - 10.1111/jvs.12762
Subject(s) - soil seed bank , ecological succession , vegetation (pathology) , floodplain , species richness , habitat , ecology , plant community , seedling , environmental science , agronomy , biology , medicine , pathology
Abstract Questions This study investigates soil seed banks in relation to established vegetation in the floodplain of a large river with high‐energy floods. It addresses the composition of seed banks and extant vegetation over a wide flooding and succession gradient. Tested hypotheses were: (a) species richness and seed bank density are highest in mid‐succession habitats; (b) seed bank variability increases with succession; (c) the proportion of species in the established vegetation with permanent seed banks declines with succession; and (d) similarity between vegetation and seed bank declines with succession. Location Mareau‐aux‐Prés, the Loire River, close to Orléans, France. Methods Seed banks and vegetation were sampled in five habitats from a succession series: (a) Pioneer vegetation of shores and sandbanks; (b) softwood shrubs; (c) softwood forest; (d) mature forest; and (e) Elytrigia ‐dominated grasslands. Sample units were 5 m × 5 m plots. Soil samples were taken from the upper 6 cm. Seed banks were studied via the seedling emergence method, followed by screening of sediment for remaining seeds. Composition of seed banks was compared to that of vegetation using the Sørenson similarity index. Results Seed bank density varied between 260 and 11,260 seeds/m 2 . Clear differences between habitats existed in the composition of species in seed banks and established vegetation. Seeds of most dominant species were distributed across the whole range of floodplain habitats but species were more restricted in the vegetation. Species richness and seed bank densities did not vary with succession as expected, but the proportion of species that produce persistent seed banks did decline with succession. Conclusions Floodplains of large rivers provide an excellent context to test hypotheses about the processes that influence the links between seed banks and standing vegetation. In the case of high‐energy floods and high sediment dynamics, the methods commonly used to study seed banks can, however, be questioned.