
Adenovirus 2, B ordetella bronchiseptica , and Parainfluenza Molecular Diagnostic Assay Results in Puppies After vaccination with Modified Live Vaccines
Author(s) -
RuchGallie R.,
Moroff S.,
Lappin M.R.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of veterinary internal medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.356
H-Index - 103
eISSN - 1939-1676
pISSN - 0891-6640
DOI - 10.1111/jvim.13821
Subject(s) - vaccination , medicine , bordetella bronchiseptica , virology , canine distemper , virus , attenuated vaccine , immunology , biology , gene , virulence , biochemistry , genetics , bacteria
Background Canine adenovirus 2, parainfluenza, and B ordetella bronchiseptica cause respiratory disease in dogs, and each has a modified live intranasal vaccine available. Molecular diagnostic assays to amplify specific nucleic acids are available for each of these agents. If positive molecular diagnostic assay results are common after vaccination, the positive predictive value of the diagnostic assays for disease would be decreased. Objective To determine the impact of administration of commercially available modified live topical adenovirus 2, B . bronchiseptica , and parainfluenza vaccine has on the results of a commercially available PCR panel. Animals Eight puppies from a research breeding facility negative for these pathogens. Methods Blinded prospective pilot study. Puppies were vaccinated with a single dose of modified live topical adenovirus 2, B . bronchiseptica , and parainfluenza and parenteral dose of adenovirus 2, canine distemper virus, and parvovirus. Nasal and pharyngeal swabs were collected on multiple days and submitted for PCR assay. Results Nucleic acids of all 3 organisms contained in the topical vaccine were detected from both samples multiple times through 28 days after vaccination with higher numbers of positive samples detected between days 3 and 10 after vaccination. Conclusions and Clinical Importance Vaccine status should be considered when interpreting respiratory agent PCR results if modified live vaccines have been used. Development of quantitative PCR and wild‐type sequencing are necessary to improve positive predictive value of these assays by distinguishing vaccinate from natural infection.