z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Controlling Culex pipiens : antagonists are more efficient than a neonicotinoid insecticide
Author(s) -
Meyabeme Elono Alvine Larissa,
Foit Kaarina,
Duquesne Sabine,
Liess Matthias
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of vector ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.688
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1948-7134
pISSN - 1081-1710
DOI - 10.1111/jvec.12279
Subject(s) - thiacloprid , biology , microcosm , culex pipiens , context (archaeology) , toxicology , pesticide , ecology , larva , imidacloprid , paleontology , thiamethoxam
Species vulnerability to pesticides depends on physiological sensitivity, the potential to recover, and the ecological context. We assessed the vulnerability of the mosquito Culex pipiens to a repeated treatment with thiacloprid in outdoor microcosms with and without antagonists (competitive and predatory invertebrates). Microcosms were treated repeatedly (three times) with thiacloprid at a concentration of 0.1, 1, or 10 µg/liter. In microcosms without antagonists, the abundance of Cx. pipiens larvae decreased moderately after the second and the third exposures to 10 µg/liter thiacloprid. In microcosms with antagonists, the abundance of Cx. pipiens larvae declined to approximately zero in the control group and the low concentration treatments during the five weeks of observation. By contrast, the abundance of Cx. pipiens larvae temporarily increased at 10 µg/liter thiacloprid after the second and third contamination. We explained this positive effect on the development of Cx. pipiens because of the decrease in competition due to the elimination of sensitive antagonists combined with the high recovery potential of Cx. pipiens . Based on these results, natural antagonists must be supported for the sustainable control of mosquitoes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here