z-logo
Premium
Debate: Seven Ways to be A Realist About Language
Author(s) -
ElderVass Dave
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal for the theory of social behaviour
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.615
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1468-5914
pISSN - 0021-8308
DOI - 10.1111/jtsb.12040
Subject(s) - normative , phenomenon , ontology , epistemology , linguistics , sociology , process (computing) , language structure , cognitive science , psychology , computer science , philosophy , operating system
There are many differing ways to be a realist about language. This paper seeks to classify some of these and to examine the implications of each for the study of language. The principle of classification it adopts is that we may distinguish between realisms on the basis of what exactly it is that they take to be real. Examining in turn realisms that ascribe reality to the external world in general, to causal mechanisms, to innate capacities, to linguistic signs, to social structures, to language systems, and to linguistic groups, the paper summarises the case for a particular critical realist ontology of language. In the process, it engages briefly with the work of S aussure, C homsky, H alliday, and more recent explicitly realist thinkers such as B haskar, P ateman, A rcher, S ealey and C arter. One implication is that language itself is not a phenomenon that separates us from a causally structured world, but rather a part of that world, a part with an identifiable causal structure of its own that is similar to that of other normative phenomena.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here