z-logo
Premium
The Romantic Realism of Michel Foucault The Scientific Temptation
Author(s) -
Varela Charles R.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal for the theory of social behaviour
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.615
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1468-5914
pISSN - 0021-8308
DOI - 10.1111/jtsb.12000
Subject(s) - epistemology , subject (documents) , nothing , temptation , agency (philosophy) , naturalism , context (archaeology) , philosophy , determinism , realism , object (grammar) , sociology , scientific realism , metaphysics , computer science , paleontology , linguistics , theology , library science , biology
B eatrice H an has argued that the theories of subjection (determinism: structure) and subjectivation (freedom: agency) are the “the blind spot[s] of Foucault's work.” Furthermore, she continues, as historical and transcendental theories, respectively, Foucault left them in a state of irresolvable conflict. In the S cientific T emptation I have shown that, as a practicing researcher, F oucault encourages us to situate the theories of the subject in the context of his un‐thematized search for a metaphysics of realism, the purpose of which was to ground his complementary reach for a possibility of naturalism. In Returning to K ant I now argue that it is this fundamental feature of “ F oucault's F oucault” that drives his returns to K ant, the purpose of which was to resolve the conflicting theories of the subject and thereby solve his G iddensian problem of structure and creativity. Locating the returns and their purpose in the context of my own arguments for the recovery of human agency, I argue that F oucault's attempts to solve his G iddensian problem led to two unfortunate solutions. In the first return, his resort to B audelaire's aesthetic subject is a regression to a pre‐noumenal conception of the K antian subject. With the second return, the reinstatement of the K antian subject as causally empowered, minus the noumenalism, is nothing more than a reclamation of K ant's conception. I argue that only a reconstruction of F oucault's scientific realism permits us to understand that he could have moved beyond mere reclamation to the actual recovery of human agency.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here