Premium
Bleeding risk by intensity of anticoagulation in critically ill patients with COVID‐19: A retrospective cohort study
Author(s) -
Halaby Rim,
Cuker Adam,
Yui Jennifer,
Matthews Andrew,
Ishaaya Ella,
Traxler Elizabeth,
Domenico Christopher,
Cooper Tara,
Tierney Ann,
Niami Pardis,
Rijst Nathalie,
Adusumalli Srinath,
Gutsche Jacob,
Giri Jay,
Pugliese Steven,
Hecht Todd E. H.,
Pishko Allyson M.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of thrombosis and haemostasis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.947
H-Index - 178
eISSN - 1538-7836
pISSN - 1538-7933
DOI - 10.1111/jth.15310
Subject(s) - medicine , intensive care unit , hazard ratio , retrospective cohort study , proportional hazards model , cohort study , cohort , confidence interval , intensive care , intensive care medicine
Background Studies report hypercoagulability in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), leading many institutions to escalate anticoagulation intensity for thrombosis prophylaxis. Objective To determine the bleeding risk with various intensities of anticoagulation in critically ill patients with COVID‐19 compared with other respiratory viral illnesses (ORVI). Patients/Methods This retrospective cohort study compared the incidence of major bleeding in patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) within a single health system with COVID‐19 versus ORVI. In the COVID‐19 cohort, we assessed the effect of anticoagulation intensity received on ICU admission on bleeding risk. We performed a secondary analysis with anticoagulation intensity as a time‐varying covariate to reflect dose changes after ICU admission. Results Four hundred and forty‐three and 387 patients were included in the COVID‐19 and ORVI cohorts, respectively. The hazard ratio of major bleeding for the COVID‐19 cohort relative to the ORVI cohort was 1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86–1.86). In COVID‐19 patients, an inverse‐probability treatment weighted model found therapeutic‐intensity anticoagulation on ICU admission had an adjusted hazard ratio of bleeding of 1.55 (95% CI: 0.88–2.73) compared with standard prophylactic‐intensity anticoagulation. However, when anticoagulation was assessed as a time‐varying covariate and adjusted for other risk factors for bleeding, the adjusted hazard ratio for bleeding on therapeutic‐intensity anticoagulation compared with standard thromboprophylaxis was 2.59 (95% CI: 1.20–5.57). Conclusions Critically ill patients with COVID‐19 had a similar bleeding risk as ORVI patients. When accounting for changes in anticoagulation that occurred in COVID‐19 patients, therapeutic‐intensity anticoagulation was associated with a greater risk of major bleeding compared with standard thromboprophylaxis.