Premium
Operative spinal trauma: Thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin or a direct oral anticoagulant
Author(s) -
Hamidi Mohammad,
Zeeshan Muhammad,
Kulvatunyou Narong,
Mitra Hari S.,
Hanna Kamil,
Tang Andrew,
Northcutt Ashley,
O'Keeffe Terence,
Joseph Bellal
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of thrombosis and haemostasis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.947
H-Index - 178
eISSN - 1538-7836
pISSN - 1538-7933
DOI - 10.1111/jth.14439
Subject(s) - medicine , pulmonary embolism , low molecular weight heparin , deep vein , rivaroxaban , venous thrombosis , thrombosis , trauma center , surgery , retrospective cohort study , anesthesia , abbreviated injury scale , injury severity score , warfarin , emergency medicine , poison control , atrial fibrillation , injury prevention
Essentials Operative spine trauma patients are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may have a favorable efficacy and safety in spine trauma. Patients on DOACs had lower rates of VTE in comparison to low molecular weight heparin. DOACs did not augment the risk of surgical bleeding (transfusion, decompressive procedures).Background Spinal trauma patients are at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Objective To compare the impacts of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) as thromboprophylactic agents on outcomes in operative spinal trauma patients. Methods A 2‐year (2015‐2016) retrospective cohort analysis of such patients (spine Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] ≥ 3 and other AIS < 3) who received LMWH or DOACs was performed. Propensity score matching (1:2 ratio) followed stratification into two groups. Outcomes included rates of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE), packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion, operative interventions for spinal cord decompression, and mortality. Results Of 6036 patients, 810 (270 receiving DOACs; 540 receiving LMWH) were matched. The mean age was 62 ± 15 years, 58% were male, and the median Injury Severity Score was 12 (10‐18). Matched groups were similar in demographics, injury parameters, emergency department vital signs, hospital stay, rates of inferior vena cava filter placement, and timing of initiation of thromboprophylaxis. The overall rate of in‐hospital DVT was 5.6%, the overall rate of in‐hospital PE was 1.6%, and the mortality rate was 2.5%. DOAC patients were less likely to develop DVT (1.8% vs 7.4%) and PE (0.3% vs 2.1%). There were no differences in postprophylaxis pRBC transfusion requirements, postprophylaxis decompressive procedures on the spinal cord, or mortality. Conclusion In operative spinal trauma patients, thromboprophylaxis with DOACs appears to be associated with lower rates of DVT and PE. Further prospective clinical trials should evaluate the role of DOACs in preventing VTE events in spinal trauma patients.