Premium
Rapid quantitative D ‐dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort management study
Author(s) -
Bates S. M.,
Takach Lapner S.,
Douketis J. D.,
Kearon C.,
Julian J.,
Parpia S.,
Schulman S.,
Weitz J. I.,
Linkins L. A.,
Crowther M.,
Lim W.,
Spencer F. A.,
Lee A. Y. Y.,
Gross P. L.,
Ginsberg J.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of thrombosis and haemostasis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.947
H-Index - 178
eISSN - 1538-7836
pISSN - 1538-7933
DOI - 10.1111/jth.13234
Subject(s) - medicine , pulmonary embolism , d dimer , latex fixation test , prospective cohort study , pre and post test probability , cohort , predictive value of tests , surgery , antibody , immunology
Essentials It is not known if D ‐dimer testing alone can safely exclude pulmonary embolism (PE). We studied the safety of using a quantitative latex agglutination D ‐dimer to exclude PE in 808 patients. 52% of patients with suspected PE had a negative D ‐dimer test and were followed for 3 months. The negative predictive value of D ‐dimer testing alone was 99.8%, suggesting it may safely exclude PE.Summary Background Strategies are needed to exclude pulmonary embolism (PE) efficiently without the need for imaging tests. Although validated rules for clinical probability assessment can be combined with d ‐dimer testing to safely exclude PE, the rules can be complicated or partially subjective, which limits their use. Objectives To determine if PE can be safely excluded in patients with a negative D ‐dimer without incorporating clinical probability assessment. Patients/Methods We enrolled consecutive outpatients and inpatients with suspected PE from four tertiary care hospitals. All patients underwent D ‐dimer testing using the MDA D ‐dimer test, a quantitative latex agglutination assay. PE was excluded in patients with a D ‐dimer less than 750 μg FEU L −1 without further testing. Patients with D ‐dimer levels of 750 μg FEU L −1 or higher underwent standardized imaging tests for PE. All patients in whom PE was excluded had anticoagulant therapy withheld and were followed for 3 months for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Suspected events during follow‐up were adjudicated centrally. Results Eight hundred and eight patients were enrolled, of whom 99 (12%) were diagnosed with VTE at presentation. Four hundred and twenty (52%) patients had a negative D ‐dimer level at presentation and were not treated with anticoagulants; of these, one had VTE during follow‐up. The negative predictive value of D ‐dimer testing for PE was 99.8% (95% confidence interval, 98.7–99.9%). Conclusions A negative latex agglutination D ‐dimer assay is seen in about one‐half of patients with suspected PE and reliably excludes PE as a stand‐alone test.