Premium
Resistance to APC and SHBG levels during use of a four‐phasic oral contraceptive containing dienogest and estradiol valerate: a randomized controlled trial
Author(s) -
Raps M.,
Rosendaal F.,
Ballieux B.,
Rosing J.,
Thomassen S.,
Helmerhorst F.,
Vliet H.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of thrombosis and haemostasis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.947
H-Index - 178
eISSN - 1538-7836
pISSN - 1538-7933
DOI - 10.1111/jth.12172
Subject(s) - estradiol valerate , dienogest , sex hormone binding globulin , levonorgestrel , medicine , thyroxine binding globulin , gynecology , estrogen , regimen , population , endocrinology , hormone , family planning , androgen , triiodothyronine , endometriosis , environmental health , research methodology
Summary Background The use of combined oral contraceptives is associated with a 3‐ to 6‐fold increased risk of venous thrombosis. This increased risk depends on the estrogen dose as well as the progestogen type of combined oral contraceptives. Thrombin generation‐based activated protein C resistance ( APC resistance) and sex hormone‐binding globulin ( SHBG ) levels predict the thrombotic risk of a combined hormonal contraceptive. Recently, a four‐phasic oral contraceptive containing dienogest ( DNG ) and estradiol valerate ( E 2 V ) has been marketed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the thrombotic risk of the DNG / E 2 V oral contraceptive by comparing APC resistance by measuring normalized APC sensitivity ratios ( nAPC sr) and SHBG levels in users of oral contraceptives containing dienogest and estradiol valerate ( DNG / E 2 V ) and oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol ( LNG/EE ). Methods We conducted a single‐center, randomized, open label, parallel‐group study in 74 women using DNG /E2V or LNG/EE , and measured nAPC sr and SHBG levels in every phase of the regimen of DNG/E2V. Results During the pill cycle SHBG levels did not differ between DNG /E2V users and LNG/EE users. nAPC sr levels were overall slightly lower in DNG /E2V users than in LNG/EE users, mean difference −0.44 (95% CI, −1.04 to 0.17) for day 2, −0.20 (95% CI, −0.76 to 0.37) for day 7, −0.27 (95% CI, −0.81 to 0.28) for day 24 and −0.34 (95% CI, −0.91 to 0.24) for day 26. Conclusion No statistical significant differences in n APC sr and SHBG levels were found between users of the oral contraceptive containing DNG / E 2 V and LNG / EE , suggesting a comparable thrombotic risk