Premium
God Versus Party: Competing Effects on Attitudes Concerning Criminal Punishment, National Security, and Military Service
Author(s) -
Thomson Robert A.,
Froese Paul
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal for the scientific study of religion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.941
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1468-5906
pISSN - 0021-8294
DOI - 10.1111/jssr.12293
Subject(s) - punishment (psychology) , politics , terrorism , government (linguistics) , political science , military service , criminology , law , national security , social psychology , sociology , psychology , linguistics , philosophy
We explore how images of God interact with political party to predict attitudes concerning the appropriate role of government in both criminal punishment and national security. Using the second wave of the Baylor Religion Survey (2007), we analyze the extent to which beliefs regarding God's moral judgment moderate the influence of party affiliation on opinions about the death penalty, fighting terrorism, punishing criminals, serving in the military, and U.S. involvement in the Iraq War. Specifically, we find that Democrats who believe in a judgmental God tend to support more conservative policies. In fact, attitudes converge such that the effects of party membership are erased if rival partisans both believe in a judgmental moral authority.