Learning and adherence to baby massage after two teaching strategies | Zendy

Cruz Cláudia Marchetti | Zendy; Caromano Fátima Aparecida | Zendy; Gonçalves Lia Lopes | Zendy; Machado Thais Gaiad | Zendy; Voos Mariana Callil | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Premium

Learning and adherence to baby massage after two teaching strategies

Author(s) -

Cruz Cláudia Marchetti,

Caromano Fátima Aparecida,

Gonçalves Lia Lopes,

Machado Thais Gaiad,

Voos Mariana Callil

Publication year - 2014

Publication title -

journal for specialists in pediatric nursing

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.499

H-Index - 38

eISSN - 1744-6155

pISSN - 1539-0136

DOI - 10.1111/jspn.12076

Subject(s) - massage , medicine , childbirth , nursing , psychology , physical therapy , family medicine , pregnancy , alternative medicine , pathology , biology , genetics

Purpose Little is known about learning/adherence after different baby massage teaching strategies. We compared the learning/adherence after two strategies. Design and Methods Twenty mothers from the group manual‐course ( GMC ) and 20 from the group manual‐orientations ( GMO ) received a booklet. GMC participated in a course during the third trimester. GMO received verbal instructions during the postpartum hospital stay. Multiple‐choice and practical tests assessed learning ( GMC : performing strokes on a doll; GMO : on the baby). Adherence was measured 3 months after childbirth. Results No differences were found between the groups in learning/adherence. Practice Implications Both teaching strategies showed similar and positive results.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research