Premium
Rural Primary Care Providers’ Experience and Usage of Clinical Recommendations in the CDC Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Guideline: A Qualitative Study
Author(s) -
Daugherty Jill,
Waltzman Dana,
Popat Shena,
Groenendaal Amy Horn,
Cherney Margaret,
Knudson Alana
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the journal of rural health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.439
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1748-0361
pISSN - 0890-765X
DOI - 10.1111/jrh.12530
Subject(s) - guideline , medicine , health care , emergency department , traumatic brain injury , usability , family medicine , nursing , medical emergency , psychiatry , pathology , human–computer interaction , computer science , economics , economic growth
Purpose In 2018, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released an evidence‐based guideline on pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) to educate health care providers on best practices of mTBI diagnosis, prognosis, and management/treatment. As residents living in rural areas have higher rates of mTBI, and may have limited access to care, it is particularly important to disseminate the CDC guideline to rural health care providers. The purpose of this paper is to describe rural health care providers’ experience with pediatric mTBI patients and their perceptions on incorporating the guideline recommendations into their practice. Method Interviews with 9 pediatric rural health care providers from all US regions were conducted. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed for themes for each of the main topic areas covered in the interview guide. Findings Common causes of mTBI reported by health care providers included sports and all‐terrain vehicles. While health care providers found the guideline recommendations to be helpful and feasible, they reported barriers to implementation, such as lack of access to specialists. To help with uptake of the CDC guideline, they suggested the development of concise implementation tools that can be referenced quickly, integrated into electronic health record‐based systems, and that are customized by visit type and health care setting (eg, initial vs follow‐up visits and emergency department vs primary care visits). Conclusion Length, accessibility, and usability are important considerations when designing clinical tools for busy rural health care providers caring for pediatric patients with mTBI. Customized information, in both print and digital formats, may help with uptake of best practices.