Premium
Efficacy of “Mentoring to Be Active” on Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, and Body Fat among Obese and Extremely Obese Youth in Rural Appalachia
Author(s) -
Smith Laureen H.,
Petosa Rick L.,
Laurent Devin
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the journal of rural health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.439
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1748-0361
pISSN - 0890-765X
DOI - 10.1111/jrh.12410
Subject(s) - body mass index , medicine , obesity , appalachia , odds ratio , percentile , demography , weight loss , confidence interval , physical therapy , gerontology , biology , paleontology , statistics , mathematics , sociology
Purpose This study compares the efficacy of a behavioral skills mentoring program ( Mentored Planning to Be Active [MBA] ) to a teacher‐led program ( Planning to Be Active [PBA]) for increasing physical activity in Appalachian teens on health outcomes (weight loss, body mass index (BMI), and body fat). Methods Secondary analysis of a larger group‐randomized controlled trial was conducted in 20 rural Appalachian schools. Descriptive Pearson correlations and multivariate analyses with between‐subject effects were conducted. Effect sizes (ES) using Cohen's d and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Findings The obese MBA group lost 77.5% more weight by T3 compared to the PBA group; T2 was ( F = 8.51, P = .000) and T3 was ( F = 7.62, P = .000). ES was 0.34. OR = 1.45 (95% CI: 0.558‐3.792) at T2 and OR = 3.32 (95% CI: 1.103‐9.978) at T3. Extremely obese in the MBA group lost 80.0% more weight compared to the PBA group; T2 was ( F = 5.23 , P = .025) and at T 3 (F = 6.33, P = .015) ES was 0.58. OR = 4.36 (95% CI: 0.981‐19.34). Extremely obese females lost more weight compared to males ( F = 4.75, P = .034). BMI and body fat had similar results; youth in the MBA group had the most improvement. Conclusions Rural Appalachian youth are disproportionately extremely obese. BMI does not capture adiposity or cardiovascular risk. BMI, BMI percentile, raw weight, fat mass, and percent body fat are more complete analyses of adiposity and cardiovascular risk.