Premium
Health‐Risk Behaviors and Protective Factors Among Adolescents in Rural British Columbia
Author(s) -
Géczy István,
Saewyc Elizabeth M.,
Poon Colleen S.,
Homma Yuko
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the journal of rural health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.439
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1748-0361
pISSN - 0890-765X
DOI - 10.1111/jrh.12389
Subject(s) - binge drinking , smokeless tobacco , prosocial behavior , logistic regression , environmental health , medicine , protective factor , rurality , demography , rural area , poison control , suicide prevention , psychology , tobacco use , psychiatry , population , pathology , sociology
Purpose This study explores the relationship between rural residency, selected protective factors (family and school connectedness along with prosocial peer attitudes), and health‐compromising behaviors (alcohol and tobacco use and nonuse of seatbelt) among adolescents. Methods A subsample of adolescents residing in remote areas was extracted from a province‐wide, school‐based survey in British Columbia (BC), Canada (weighted N = 2,999). We employed χ 2 statistic to test rural‐urban differences separately by gender. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between protective factors and behaviors compromising health. Findings In boys, rural residency was associated with multiple problem behaviors (binge drinking, smokeless tobacco use, and nonuse of seatbelt), whereas for girls it was linked to riding without a seatbelt. The final logistic regression models confirmed that rural environment was a significant risk factor for not wearing a seatbelt among both boys and girls, and smokeless tobacco among boys (adjusted odds ratio between 1.44 and 3.05). Rurality, on the other hand, did not predict binge drinking. Logistic regression analyses also revealed that both school connectedness and prosocial peer attitude protected boys against binge drinking and smokeless tobacco, but the results were not as robust for girls. Conclusions These findings could provide information for location‐based intervention efforts promoting adolescent health, highlighting the protective role of the school atmosphere and prosocial peer relationships, especially among boys.