Premium
Degradation pattern of a porcine collagen membrane in an in vivo model of guided bone regeneration
Author(s) -
Calciolari E.,
Ravanetti F.,
Strange A.,
Mardas N.,
Bozec L.,
Cacchioli A.,
Kostomitsopoulos N.,
Donos N.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of periodontal research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.31
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1600-0765
pISSN - 0022-3484
DOI - 10.1111/jre.12530
Subject(s) - in vivo , regeneration (biology) , collagenase , membrane , chemistry , bone healing , biomedical engineering , pathology , wound healing , microbiology and biotechnology , biophysics , anatomy , medicine , biology , biochemistry , surgery , enzyme
Background and Objective Although collagen membranes have been clinically applied for guided tissue/bone regeneration for more than 30 years, their in vivo degradation pattern has never been fully clarified. A better understanding of the different stages of in vivo degradation of collagen membranes is extremely important, considering that the biology of bone regeneration requires the presence of a stable and cell/tissue‐occlusive barrier during the healing stages in order to ensure a predictable result. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the degradation pattern of a porcine non‐cross‐linked collagen membrane in an in vivo model of guided bone regeneration ( GBR ). Material and Methods Decalcified and paraffin‐embedded specimens from calvarial defects of 18, 10‐month‐old Wistar rats were used. The defects were treated with a double layer of collagen membrane and a deproteinized bovine bone mineral particulate graft. At 7, 14 and 30 days of healing, qualitative evaluation with scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy, and histomorphometric measurements were performed. Markers of collagenase activity and bone formation were investigated using an immunofluorescence technique. Results A significant reduction of membrane thickness was observed from 7 to 30 days of healing, which was associated with progressive loss of collagen alignment, increased collagen remodeling and progressive invasion of woven bone inside the membranes. A limited inflammatory infiltrate was observed at all time points of healing. Conclusion The collagen membrane investigated was biocompatible and able to promote bone regeneration. However, pronounced signs of degradation were observed starting from day 30. Since successful regeneration is obtained only when cell occlusion and space maintenance exist for the healing time needed by the bone progenitor cells to repopulate the defect, the suitability of collagen membranes in cases where long‐lasting barriers are needed needs to be further reviewed.