z-logo
Premium
Morphology and molecular phylogeny of coccoid green algae Coelastrella sensu lato (Scenedesmaceae, Sphaeropeales), including the description of three new species and two new varieties
Author(s) -
Wang Qinghua,
Song Huiyin,
Liu Xudong,
Liu Benwen,
Hu Zhengyu,
Liu Guoxiang
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of phycology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.85
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1529-8817
pISSN - 0022-3646
DOI - 10.1111/jpy.12915
Subject(s) - biology , sensu , phylogenetic tree , clade , genus , phylogenetics , taxon , botany , zoology , taxonomy (biology) , evolutionary biology , gene , genetics
The genus Coelastrella was established by Chodat ( Bull. Soc. Bot. Geneve , 13 [1922] 66), and was characterized as being unicellular or in few‐celled aggregations with many longitudinal ribs on the cell wall. Many species of this genus showed strong ability to accumulate carotenoids and oils, so they have recently attracted much attention from researchers due to its potential applicability in the energy and food industries. In this study, a total of 23 strains of Coelastrella were sampled from China, and three new species and two new varieties were described: C. thermophila sp. nov., C. yingshanensis sp. nov., C. tenuitheca sp. nov., C. thermophila var. globulina var. nov., C. rubescens var. oocystiformis var. nov. Besides 18S rDNA and ITS 2 sequences, we have newly sequenced the tuf A gene marker for this taxon. Phylogenetic analysis combined with morphological studies revealed four morphotypes within the Coelastrella sensu lato clade, which contained the morphotype of original Coelastrella , original Scotiellopsis , Asterarcys , and morphotype of C. vacuolata and C. tenuitheca sp. nov. The relationships between morphological differences and phylogenic diversity based on different markers were discussed. Our results support that 18S rDNA was too conserved to be used a species‐specific or even a genus‐specific marker in this clade. The topology of tuf A gene‐based phylogenetic tree had a better match with the morphological findings.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here