z-logo
Premium
Effects of dietary supplementation of selenium‐enriched probiotics on production performance and intestinal microbiota of weanling piglets raised under high ambient temperature
Author(s) -
Lv C. H.,
Wang T.,
Regmi N.,
Chen X.,
Huang K.,
Liao S. F.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.651
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1439-0396
pISSN - 0931-2439
DOI - 10.1111/jpn.12326
Subject(s) - weanling , selenium , zoology , biology , lactobacillus , feces , probiotic , food science , chemistry , fermentation , bacteria , endocrinology , microbiology and biotechnology , organic chemistry , genetics
Summary This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of selenium‐enriched probiotics (SeP) on production performance and intestinal microbiota of piglets raised under high ambient temperature. Forty‐eight cross‐bred weanling piglets (28 days old), randomly allotted into 12 pens (four piglets/pen) and four dietary treatments (three pens/treatment group), were fed ad libitum for 42 days a basal diet (Con) or the basal diet supplemented with probiotics (Pro), sodium selenite ( IS e) or a SeP preparation. Blood and faecal samples were collected on days 0, 14, 28 and 42 post‐treatment. The SeP group had higher final BW (p   <   0.05), greater ADG (p   <   0.05) and lower FCR (p   <   0.01) than the Pro, IS e or Con group. The diarrhoea incidence rate of either SeP or Pro group was lower (p   <   0.01) than the IS e or Con group. Blood Se concentration and GSH ‐Px activity were both higher (p   <   0.01) in the SeP than in the Pro, IS e or Con group. On days 28 and 42, the serum concentrations of T3 were higher (p   <   0.01) and T4 lower (p   <   0.01) in the SeP than in the IS e group, and the T3 and T4 concentrations in the IS e group, in turn, were higher (p   <   0.05) and lower (p   <   0.01), respectively, than in the Pro or Con group. Also on days 28 and 42, the faecal counts of lactobacillus bacteria were higher (p   <   0.01) while Escherichia coli lower (p   <   0.01) in the SeP or Pro group as compared to the IS e or Con group. The results of RFLP showed that the faecal microbial flora in the SeP group changed the most (numerically) as compared to the Pro or IS e group. These results suggest that the SeP product may serve as a better alternative to antibiotics than the solo probiotics for using as a growth promoter for weanling piglets.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here