Premium
Cross‐cultural validation of the 20‐item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in Chinese adolescents
Author(s) -
Ling Y.,
Zeng Y.,
Yuan H.,
Zhong M.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.69
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1365-2850
pISSN - 1351-0126
DOI - 10.1111/jpm.12298
Subject(s) - alexithymia , toronto alexithymia scale , psychology , cronbach's alpha , clinical psychology , confirmatory factor analysis , somatization , checklist , mainland china , psychometrics , psychiatry , structural equation modeling , mental health , china , statistics , mathematics , political science , law , cognitive psychology
Accessible summary What is known on the subject? The TAS‐20 is the most widely used self‐reported questionnaire to assess the level of alexithymia in students and community and clinical samples.What this paper adds to existing knowledge? The TAS‐20‐C exhibited high levels of reliability and validity, indicating that it is appropriate for the assessment of alexithymia in Chinese adolescents.What are the implications for practice? Screening adolescents who are at risk of alexithymia through the TAS‐20 could help to perform necessary and effective precautions to decrease the adverse effects of alexithymia, such as the risks of developing depressive mood and behavioral problems.Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the 20‐item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS‐20‐C) in a sample of Chinese adolescents. Method Adolescents ( n = 1260) recruited from three schools in mainland China completed the TAS‐20‐C, the somatization subscale of the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL‐90) and Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES‐D). Five different factorial models of the TAS‐20 were tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Cronbach's α, mean inter‐item correlations and predictive validity were also evaluated. Results Among those five different factorial models, the four‐factor structure model was suitable and invariant across gender and age in this sample. The TAS‐20‐C demonstrated adequate internal reliability. Gender and age accounted for insignificant amounts of variability in total TAS‐20‐C and factor scores. TAS‐20‐C total and subscale scores were correlated significantly with SCL‐90 somatization subscale and CES‐D. Girls scored higher than boys on difficulty identifying feelings (DIF) and pragmatic thinking (PR) subscales. DIF and lack of subjective significance or importance of emotions (IMs) subscale scores were higher among younger than among middle and older adolescents. Implications for Practice Validating the TAS‐20 in adolescents is quite important to use it in evaluating adolescents' alexithymia, and screen those at risk of alexithymia.