Premium
Re‐storying narrative identity: a dialogical study of mental health recovery and survival
Author(s) -
Grant A.,
LeighPhippard H.,
Short N. P.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.69
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1365-2850
pISSN - 1351-0126
DOI - 10.1111/jpm.12188
Subject(s) - redress , dialogical self , narrative , mental health , identity (music) , argument (complex analysis) , sociology , narrative inquiry , diversity (politics) , psychology , epistemology , psychotherapist , social psychology , medicine , aesthetics , political science , law , linguistics , anthropology , philosophy
Accessible summary Current UK mental health nursing policy is critiqued for neglecting the storied complexities of recovery‐survival. Within a critical framework, creative non‐fiction is used in a relational auto‐ethnographic design to produce two short stories that demonstrate the utility of narrative re‐storying in recovery‐survival. New insights emerge for mental health nurse practice and research. These are: that narrative re‐storying may help the recovery process for individuals and communities; that hybrid transcultural writing positively undermines barriers between professionals and consumers of mental health; and that all of this constitutes contemporary methodological innovation in narrative inquiry and related practice.Abstract Some of the complexities of recovery and survival are arguably relatively neglected in current UK mental health nursing policy and, by association, clinical and research practice. In order to redress this, this paper, part of larger research project, will present two short stories, contextualized in a critical theoretical and methodological position. The overall significance of the argument in the paper is in its emerging benefits and implications for users of mental health services, practitioners and researchers. The central, orienting principle in the paper, cohering with all of its strands, is ‘narrative re‐storying’. Organized in three parts, the first reviews selected relevant background policy and related literature, the contextual and theoretical bases of the paper, and related methodological and ethical issues. The second presents the two stories, and the third brings the paper to a close. It does so in discussing specific and global emerging implications for mental health nursing practice and research, around narrative re‐storying as a recovery tool and methodological innovations that include ‘hybrid’ writing.