Premium
Innovation Performance in New Product Development Teams in C hina's Technology Ventures: The Role of Behavioral Integration Dimensions and Collective Efficacy
Author(s) -
Liu Jingjiang,
Chen Jiyao,
Tao Yi
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of product innovation management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.646
H-Index - 144
eISSN - 1540-5885
pISSN - 0737-6782
DOI - 10.1111/jpim.12177
Subject(s) - new product development , product (mathematics) , business , emerging markets , social exchange theory , product innovation , marketing , cognition , collectivism , process (computing) , knowledge management , psychology , economics , social psychology , computer science , market economy , geometry , mathematics , finance , neuroscience , individualism , operating system
In emerging markets, technology ventures increasingly rely on new product development ( NPD ) teams to generate creative ideas and to mold these innovative ideas into streams of new products or services. However, little is known about how behavioral integration (a behavioral team process) and collective efficacy (a motivational team process) jointly facilitate or inhibit team innovation performance in emerging markets—especially in C hina, the world's largest emerging‐market setting with collectivist and high power distance cultures. Drawing on social cognitive theory and behavioral integration research, this article elucidates the relationships between behavioral integration dimensions (i.e., collaborative behavior, information exchange, and joint decision‐making) and innovation performance and also examines how collective efficacy moderates these relationships in C hina's NPD teams. Results from a sample of 96 NPD teams in C hina's technology ventures reveal that information exchange is positively associated with innovation performance. Collaborative behavior positively but marginally influences innovation performance, whereas joint decision‐making does not relate to innovation performance. Moreover, collective efficacy demonstrates an important moderating role. Specifically, both collaborative behavior and joint decision‐making are more positively associated with innovation performance when collective efficacy is higher. In contrast, information exchange is less positively associated with innovation performance when collective efficacy is higher. This study makes important theoretical contributions to the literature on team innovation and behavioral integration in emerging markets by offering a better understanding of how behavioral and motivational team processes jointly shape innovation performance in C hina's NPD teams. This study also extends social cognitive theory by identifying collective efficacy as a boundary condition for the overall effectiveness of behavioral integration dimensions. In particular, this study highlights the condition under which behavioral integration dimensions facilitate or inhibit NPD team innovation performance in C hina.