Premium
Use of the consolidated framework for implementation research to assess determinants of silver diamine fluoride implementation in safety net dental clinics
Author(s) -
Weintraub Jane A.,
Birken Sarah A.,
Burgette Jacqueline M.,
Lewis Teresa A.,
White B. Alexander
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of public health dentistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.64
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1752-7325
pISSN - 0022-4006
DOI - 10.1111/jphd.12324
Subject(s) - protocol (science) , medicine , safety net , focus group , medical education , nursing , environmental health , business , alternative medicine , pathology , marketing
Abstract Objectives In the United States, silver diamine fluoride (SDF) is a relatively new, quick, and low‐cost method for arresting dental caries. This study's purpose was to identify determinants of the implementation of an SDF protocol for pediatric patients in three safety net clinics to inform future efforts to implement the protocol. Methods We familiarized dental personnel with the SDF protocol through on‐site education and feedback sessions. Two months after the educational sessions, we conducted focus groups with a total of eight dentists and 21 staff across three North Carolina safety net dental clinics: a private nonprofit healthcare network, a community health center, and a county health department. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to understand determinants of implementation of the protocol. Results Determinants of SDF protocol implementation included SDF protocol characteristics (e.g., source of protocol and its ease of use and adaptability, relative advantage compared to alternatives, low cost), characteristics of the outer setting or the dental clinic's environment (e.g., patient needs), inner setting or dental clinics’ characteristics (e.g., culture of safety net clinic, leadership engagement), characteristics of dental personnel (e.g., concerns were alleviated by the training and having the protocol), and process characteristics (e.g., training and technical assistance from a reliable source). Overall, implementation was less successful in clinics with less leadership engagement and turnover of dental personnel who did not receive the training. Conclusions The determinants of SDF protocol implementation identified in this study will be useful to guide future efforts to implement the SDF protocol.