Premium
Investigating the temporality of binary taste interactions in blends of sweeteners and citric acid in solution
Author(s) -
Junge Jonas Y.,
Mielby Line A.,
Zeng Yan,
Sun YuanXia,
Byrne Derek V.,
Castura John C.,
Kidmose Ulla
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of sensory studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.61
H-Index - 53
eISSN - 1745-459X
pISSN - 0887-8250
DOI - 10.1111/joss.12785
Subject(s) - citric acid , sucrose , sweetening , taste , food science , chemistry , saccharin , factorial experiment , sweetening agents , mathematics , biology , statistics , endocrinology
This study investigated sweet–sour taste interactions in novel sweeteners using a 3 × 2 factorial design consisting of Sweetening System (three levels: sucrose; d ‐allulose; and a blend of d ‐allulose and Monk fruit extract) and Acidity (two levels: with or without citric acid). 110 untrained Chinese subjects participated using the temporal check‐all‐that‐apply (TCATA) method. Mixed‐model ANOVA was conducted to investigate the effect of Sweetening System, Acidity, and their interactions on the fractional Area Under the Curve within three 20 s time intervals (attack, evolution, finish). Treatments were compared using Dunnett's test with sucrose as control. Citric acid suppressed the sweet taste of both sucrose and d ‐allulose more than the blend of d ‐allulose and Monk fruit extract throughout attack and evolution time intervals. This finding was confirmed by a significant interaction between Sweetening System and Acidity for sweet taste. Sour taste was not affected differently by different Sweetening Systems or the difference in sweetener concentration. Practical Applications This study showed that the sweet taste of a blend of sweeteners could be altered by citric acid to have a similar temporal profile as sucrose in most of the evaluation time. This emphasizes the importance of not only conducting evaluations of novel sweeteners in aqueous solutions but also considering studies in more complex matrices and the choice of the methodology used to measure the sensory profile.