z-logo
Premium
Warmth‐Competence Tradeoffs in Impression Management across Race and Social‐Class Divides
Author(s) -
Swencionis Jillian K.,
Dupree Cydney H.,
Fiske Susan T.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of social issues
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.618
H-Index - 122
eISSN - 1540-4560
pISSN - 0022-4537
DOI - 10.1111/josi.12210
Subject(s) - psychology , social psychology , perception , impression management , competence (human resources) , interpersonal communication , impression formation , outgroup , social perception , salient , political science , neuroscience , law
The Great Recession widened social‐class divides, so social interactions across gaps in workplace status and in race generally may be more salient and more fraught. Different statuses and races both carry stereotypes that targets know ( meta‐perceptions , how they expect to be viewed by the outgroup). In both cross‐status and cross‐race interactions, targets may aim to manage the impressions they create. Reviewing literature and our own recent work invokes (a) the role of the Stereotype Content Model's two dimensions of social perception, namely warmth and competence; (b) the compensation effect, a tendency to tradeoff between them, especially downplaying one to convey the other; and (c) diverging warmth and competence concerns of people with lower and higher status and racial‐group positions. Higher‐status people and Whites, both stereotyped as competent but cold, seek to warm up their image. Lower‐status people and Blacks, both stereotyped as warm but incompetent, seek respect for their competence. Overviews of two previously separate research programs and the background literature converge on shared findings that higher‐status people, comparing down, display a competence downshift, consistent with communicating apparent warmth. Meanwhile, lower‐status people, comparing up, often display less warmth, to communicate competence. Previous research and our diverse samples—online workplace scenarios, online cross‐race interactions, and presidential candidates’ speeches—suggest a novel, robust interpersonal mechanism that perpetuates race, status, and social‐class divides.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here