Premium
Effectiveness of an Adaptation of the Project Connect Health Systems Intervention: Youth and Clinic‐Level Findings
Author(s) -
Loosier Penny S.,
Doll Shelli,
Lepar Danielle,
Ward Kristin,
Gamble Ginger,
Dittus Patricia J.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of school health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.851
H-Index - 86
eISSN - 1746-1561
pISSN - 0022-4391
DOI - 10.1111/josh.12414
Subject(s) - reproductive health , referral , intervention (counseling) , context (archaeology) , health care , medical education , receipt , family medicine , data collection , medicine , schedule , program evaluation , sexually transmitted disease , nursing , curriculum , psychology , population , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , computer science , environmental health , pedagogy , mathematics , public administration , economic growth , world wide web , biology , operating system , paleontology , syphilis , political science , statistics , economics
BACKGROUND The Project Connect Health Systems Intervention (Project Connect) uses a systematic process of collecting community and healthcare infrastructure information to craft a referral guide highlighting local healthcare providers who provide high quality sexual and reproductive healthcare. Previous self‐report data on healthcare usage indicated Project Connect was successful with sexually experienced female youth, where it increased rates of human immunodeficiency virus ( HIV ) and sexually transmitted disease ( STD ) testing and receipt of contraception. This adaption of Project Connect examined its effectiveness in a new context and via collection of clinic encounter‐level data. METHODS Project Connect was implemented in 3 high schools. (only 2 schools remained open throughout the entire project period). Participant recruitment and data collection occurred in 5 of 8 participating health clinics. Students completed Youth Surveys (N = 608) and a Clinic Survey (paired with medical data abstraction in 2 clinics [N = 305]). RESULTS Students were more likely than nonstudents to report having reached a clinic via Project Connect. Nearly 40% of students attended a Project Connect school, with 32.7% using Project Connect to reach the clinic. Students were most likely to have been referred by a school nurse or coach. CONCLUSIONS Project Connect is a low‐cost, sustainable structural intervention with multiple applications within schools, either as a standalone intervention or in combination with ongoing efforts.